Contact lens recall 6
December 4th, 2010 
admin Product liability case involving one of the largest that sells products in san diego and could be liable san diego personal injury attorney, Johnson & Johnson announced last week that it recalled five times more contact lenses than the 100,000 it announced in August. The company said it expanded its recall in October due to eye stinging, but announced the recall only in Japan, leaving most of its American investors in the dark. The contact lens recall did not affect products sold in the U.S. market, however. San Diego Personal Injury Attorney Staff Report, Christian Science Monitor 12/02/2010
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Night lights recall 5
December 4th, 2010 admin Another Product Liability case which is one of the areas of San Diego Personal Injury law and attorney.
The Consumer Product Safety Report has announced a recall of 272,000 night lights that pose overheating risks. American Tack & Hardware Co. Inc. said that the Forever-Glo Cylinder Nite Lites have an “electrical short circuit in the night light [that] can cause it to overheat and smolder or melt which can burn consumers or result in a fire.” The company has received nine reports of products overheating but no reports of injuries. San Diego Personal Injury Attorney Staff Report, PR Newswire 12/02/2010
San Diego
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Cabinet locks recall 4
December 4th, 2010 admin This has to do with product liability cases which are part of san diego personal injury attorney cases.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission has announced a recall of more than 40,000 cabinet swing locks due to a latch malfunction. According to the product’s manufacturer, Learning Curve Brands Inc., the installed latches can break off, allowing easy access to cabinets. The company has received seven reports of the latches breaking but no reports of injury or illness as a result. San Diego Personal Injury Attorney Staff Report, PR Newswire 12/02/2010
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Toyota causes acceleration defect 3
December 4th, 2010 admin These san diego personal injury attorney cases are prevalent throughout the state and the country A California woman has filed a lawsuit against Toyota alleging a sudden acceleration defect contributed to a 2008 freeway crash she was involved in. The woman’s Lexus suddenly sped up to 80 mph and crashed on an offramp, killing a passenger in the back seat. The woman was initially charged with felony vehicular manslaughter, but the charges were dismissed. The lawsuit, like dozens of others filed against Toyota, contends that a problem with the car’s computer throttle system caused it to accelerate on its own. San Diego Personal Injury Attorney Stuart Pfeifer, LA Times 12/03/2010
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
5 year old autistic boy voted out of kindergarden 2
December 4th, 2010 admin This case has to do with Emotional Distress which is another form of personal injury cause of action. A Florida court has awarded $350,000 to the family of a 5-year-old autistic child who was voted out of his kindergarten class in 2008. The suit claimed the teacher of the class orchestrated a vote among the class, asking the students what they didn’t like about the boy and voting him from the class, 14-2. The teacher was suspended for a year after the incident. San Diego Personal Injury Attorney Martha Neil, American Bar Association Journal 12/02/2010
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Couple’s privacy violated by Google 1
December 4th, 2010 admin This is a crossover from Personal Injury into Right of Privacy, and in this day and age we will see more of withthe expansion of the internet. Google Inc. will pay just $1 in a settlement with a Pennsylvania couple who filed a lawsuit against the company over Google Street View. The case was filed in April 2008 and originally thrown out, but reinstated by a U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in March. San Diego Personal Injury Attorney The couple claimed in the lawsuit that the service was a violation of their privacy, but Google argued “complete privacy does not exist.” The couple also said it wasn’t about the money, all they wanted was an apology. W.J. Hennigan, LA Times 12/02/2010
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »