Work environment harassment 502
April 9th, 2012 
admin Premises liability is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com
Pantoja v Anton 198 Cal.App.4th 87 (5) (2011) Pantoja claimed hostile work environment harassment Gov C § 102900. Evidence of others’ harassment held admissible only if Pantoja was present; otherwise inadmissable character evidence Ev C § 1101(b). Verdict for Anton, reversed. San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer [1] “Me-too” evidence admissible to impeach Anton’s testimony or to rebut defense testimony that Anton never did these things. Must be more than evidence of propensity to harass. [2] Lyle 38 C4th 264 instruction (FEHA is not a civility code or designed to rid workplace of vulgarity), without clarification or explanation is error for it implied more-than-vulgarity conduct was nonactionable. [3] Rehabilitation of witness who admitted enmity against Defendant may be rehabilitated only on evidence there “really is no hostility,” not by Evidence the hostility is justified, such as by Defendant’s acts. (Lengthy opinion) San Diego personal injury attorney