City of Stockton’s road 442

Premises liability is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com

Cobb v City of Stockton 192 Cal.App.4th 65 (2011) (3) City filed eminent domain action of C’s property, with order of possession, and built a road across it.  San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com But case never brought to trial and dismissed on five-year statute.  CCP § 583.310.  C brought inverse condemnation action, dismissed under statute of limitations.  [1] Klopping 8 C3d 39 damages irrelevant in that no pre condemnation conduct involved.  Instead this is a case for actual invasion.  [2] Trigger date for statute of limitations is not the date of possession–which was done lawfully at the time–but the date it became unlawful.  Here the date the temporary right of possession expired, the date the eminent domain case dismissed. San Diego personal injury attorney

Comments are closed.