Conspiracy lawsuit 410
September 19th, 2011 
admin Premises liability is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com
Central Concrete Supply Co. v Bursak 182 Cal.App.4th 1092 (2010) (1/5) Prior 2003 case: C sued S for fraud (embezzlement); S enjoined from transferring any property. But S sold property in 2006 and brought 2007 motion todissolve injunction, concealing from the court S’s sale.San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com C claimed B (S’s lawyer) engaged in conspiracy to evade the injunction, fraudulent transfer, etc. [1] B’s anti-SLAPP denied but motion to strike under Civ C § 1714.10 properly granted (to bring conspiracy action against an attorney, must first file petition to permit action togo forward. Petition not required where exempt actions, including conspiracy to violate legal duty for attorney’s financial gain 1714.10(c)(2)). [2] Permissible for trial court to grant leave to amend after granting motion to strike. Rutter Practice Guide’s assertion that court lacks such power rejected as simply wrong and certainly not supported by case Rutter cites. San Diego personal injury attorney.