Employer lawsuit 419

Premises liability is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com

Rutti v Lojack Corp. Inc. 596 F.3d 1046 (9Cir 2010)  [1] Employee R’s commuting in employer L’s car not compensable under Employee Commuter Flexibility Act 25 USC 254, even if condition of employment.San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com [2] Conditions placed on use of L’s car does not change the conclusion. Activity preliminary to commuting also not compensable, unless it is a “principal activity” of employer.  Planning day’s routes and jobs is presumptively non-compensable and, here, is also de minimis; likewise, uploading daily report at end of day.  San Diego personal injury attorney

Comments are closed.