data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd640/dd6405f6057656d2a258e3a66861b73f09369a34" alt="logo"
Insurance liability 413
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c35dc/c35dc65658e4a0dda9291d6656abc3c7bcfa5efe" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af2bb/af2bb3d98f4a270c9d5f8d1c77d45dcd5fc6b07a" alt=""
Premises liability is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com
Selzer v Barnes 182 Cal.App.4th 953 (2010) (1/5) rev denied Anti-SLAPP CCP 425.16. Prior case, HOA sued S on two theories, one covered by insurance the other not. S’s carrier’s attorney settled covered claim.San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com Attorney S sued attorney B for fraud and emotional distress, claiming B’s “secret negotiation” was fraudulent and caused emotional distress. Once covered claim dismissed, insurer refused further defense. Anti-SLAPP granted in that B’s conduct wholly w/in litigation, therefore protected activity. Because all conduct privileged CC § 47, no ‘probability of prevailing.’ Court dispatches S’s “several poorly developedarguments” that B’s negotiation violated B&PC § 6128 (deceit), Pen C § 550 (fraudulent ins. claim), CC § 2860 (Cumis codification). San Diego personal injury attorney