Jury misconduct 437

Premises liability is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com

People v Vigil 191 Cal.App.4th1474 (2011) (3) Juror, a college professor, went home, used a broomstick to see whether one could maneuver a rifle inside a car as one party claimed, and then reported experiment’s results to other jurors. San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com [1] Court considers jury misconduct claims using a three-step method: Is it (a) admissible, (b) misconduct, (c) prejudicial.  [2] Any investigation outside the courtroom “is absolutely forbidden.” [3] Juror’s experiment outside the courtroom is misconduct.  Court implies experiment inside the jury room might be acceptable.  San Diego personal injury attorney

Comments are closed.