
Mutual for employment-related entitlements 545


Premises liability is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com
Arnold v Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. 202 Cal.App.4th 580 (2011) (1/1) Arnold was nonexclusive insurance agent for Mutual. She terminated her contract and sued Mutual for employment-related entitlements (business costs, etc.). San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer MSJ that Arnold was an independent contractor, not an employee, granted, affirmed. [1] LabC § 2750 does not alter common law definition of employee. [2] No material issue of fact that she was an independent contractor. Arnold decided what and when to sell to whom and how much time to spend doing so, and could choose to sell Mutual’s or other products. No performance evaluations, monitoring or supervision of her work, etc. San Diego personal injury attorney