data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd640/dd6405f6057656d2a258e3a66861b73f09369a34" alt="logo"
Treachery and disloyalty in breaching fiduciary duty 408
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c35dc/c35dc65658e4a0dda9291d6656abc3c7bcfa5efe" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af2bb/af2bb3d98f4a270c9d5f8d1c77d45dcd5fc6b07a" alt=""
Premises Liability is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com |
Oasis West Realty, LLC v Goldman 182 Cal.App.4th 688 (2010) (2/5) Anti-SLAPP improperly denied. In earlier case, attorney G represented OW. Two years after ending representation, G took actions (signed a petition, appeared at city council) now opposing OW’s project.San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com OW sued G for “treachery and disloyalty” in breaching fiduciary duty, contract and for malpractice. [1] G’s actions are protected activity. [2] Lawyer’ duty of loyalty protects against taking second employment adverse to first client, especially as to confidentiality. Not RPC 3-310 violation where not acting on behalf of second client, nor 3-100 violation, where no confidences revealed. Lawyer does not forever forfeit right to speak on matters of public interest. “A lawyer may take positions adverse to a client, as long as current representation is not compromised [and] confidentiality is not compromised.” San Diego personal injury attorney.